Have you ever stopped to ponder the true size of Africa? The reality may surprise you. In the vast landscape of global maps, Africa often appears smaller than its actual magnitude. The deceptive portrayal of Africa’s size can be traced back to the prevalent use of the “Mercator Projection,” a cartographic technique introduced by Gerardus Mercator in 1569.
Designer Kai Krause has crafted a map that seeks to rectify this misrepresentation. The stark revelation of Krause’s creation challenges our preconceived notions about the size of Africa. So, why is Africa consistently downplayed on conventional maps?
The Mercator Projection, though valuable for navigation due to its ability to maintain constant true bearing along straight lines, distorts the relative sizes of land masses. Under this projection, Africa appears comparable in size to Greenland. However, the truth is staggering – Africa is 13 to 14 times larger than Greenland. The distortion is further exacerbated towards the poles, where landmasses are exaggerated on flat maps.
Historically, European imperialism played a role in perpetuating this misrepresentation. Even as Africa decolonized and gained independence, the imperialist mindset persisted. Maps continued to be designed with Africa in a diminished state, reflecting the desire to assert dominance. The map becomes a tool of power, shaping perceptions of size and influence.
Contrary to these misrepresentations, Africa emerges as a continental giant on Krause’s map. It surpasses the apparent sizes of well-known countries and regions, including China, the U.S., Western and Eastern Europe, Japan, Mexico, and India. Moreover, Africa dwarfs nations like Russia, Canada, Brazil, and many others. The size equals power paradigm, ingrained in our understanding, is shattered by this revelation.
Beyond the issue of size, there is a deeper, more profound meaning associated with Krause’s map. It prompts us to consider the idea that Africa is the motherland for all people, regardless of race. Scientific evidence supports the notion that all Homo sapiens share African ancestry. The earliest human remains are found in present-day Botswana, and genetic research points to a common maternal ancestor who lived in the region approximately 200,000 years ago.
Could Krause have intended to convey this powerful idea through his map? While the answer remains speculative, it adds an intriguing layer to the map’s significance. Krause’s work not only exposes the distortions created by the Mercator Projection and imperialistic tendencies but also hints at a shared human origin rooted in Africa.
In a broader context, Krause’s map aligns with the concept of “counter-mapping,” a theme discussed in various contexts. It serves as a deliberate departure from conventional cartography, aiming to spark discussions, debates, and challenges to prevailing map-making norms. By presenting Africa in its true dimensions, Krause prompts us to question the narratives embedded in maps and to explore the multifaceted aspects of power, representation, and shared human history.
In conclusion, “How big is Africa, in reality?” The answer transcends mere physical dimensions; it extends to the reclamation of narratives and the acknowledgment of Africa as the expansive and influential continent that it truly is. Krause’s map becomes a catalyst for reevaluating our perceptions, challenging established norms, and embracing a more accurate representation of our world.
Leave a Reply